Comments on: The Hope of the Wise Men http://www.unashamedsermons.com/2006/the-hope-of-the-wise-men/ Sermons preached by Darren Ethier. UnashamedSermons.com is a labor of love dedicated to all the pastors and Christian workers spreading the gospel of Jesus Christ around the world! Sat, 04 Feb 2012 03:48:28 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Darren Ethier http://www.unashamedsermons.com/2006/the-hope-of-the-wise-men/comment-page-1/#comment-264 Darren Ethier Thu, 28 Dec 2006 20:47:47 +0000 http://www.unashamedsermons.com/2006/the-hope-of-the-wise-men#comment-264 Here's some links to sources I used in my research. I forgot to include them in the posting of my message (they were included in the handout I gave my congregation) <a href="http://www.aboutbibleprophecy.com/daniel_9_24.htm" title="AboutBibleProphecy.com" rel="nofollow">www.aboutbibleprophecy.com - Daniel 9:24</a> <a href="http://www.100prophecies.org/weeks" title="Daniels Weeks" rel="nofollow">100prophecies.org - Daniel's Weeks</a> Both are okay articles dealing with the subject. However, a Google search will reveal many more resources that give different perspectives. Here’s some links to sources I used in my research. I forgot to include them in the posting of my message (they were included in the handout I gave my congregation)

http://www.aboutbibleprophecy.com – Daniel 9:24
100prophecies.org – Daniel’s Weeks

Both are okay articles dealing with the subject. However, a Google search will reveal many more resources that give different perspectives.

]]> By: Joe Craft http://www.unashamedsermons.com/2006/the-hope-of-the-wise-men/comment-page-1/#comment-263 Joe Craft Thu, 28 Dec 2006 19:23:33 +0000 http://www.unashamedsermons.com/2006/the-hope-of-the-wise-men#comment-263 Very good message. I would really like to see how the 483 years is calculated. I've seen the statement many times but have never seen it explained. Thank you, Joe Very good message.
I would really like to see how the 483 years is calculated.
I’ve seen the statement many times but have never seen it explained.
Thank you, Joe

]]>